|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 139
|
I was recently looking for a quotation in an old, frequently re-read book - the American Norton 1990 paperback of Patrick O'Brian's Master and Commander - and was suddenly struck by something that didn't look right: the leading on page 119 is visibly tighter than on page 118. I measure 118 (and all the other pages I've spot checked) as 12 points, and 119 as 11.
How can this have occurred in modern book publishing? I don't know how Norton was setting type in 1990 (or William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd in 1970, the original publication), but they surely weren't hand-setting it! |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modern Papyrus | George | General Publishing Topics | 5 | 11-02-2007 01:16 AM |
| ID and relative leading | ElyseC | Print Design | 12 | 04-22-2007 05:47 PM |
| meta tags and leading one on...'-}} | terrie | Web Site Building & Maintenance | 4 | 08-09-2006 02:02 PM |
| Fowler's Modern English Usage | Michael Rowley | On Language & Literature | 22 | 01-03-2006 07:28 AM |
| Modern Headline Styles | rod | Print Design | 2 | 02-24-2005 09:34 PM |