DTP


 
Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web


Go Back   Desktop Publishing Forum > General Discussions > Fonts & Typography

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-04-2007, 10:14 AM   #1
ktinkel
Founding Sysop
 
ktinkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Connecticut, on the Housatonic River near its mouth at Long Island Sound.
Posts: 11,189
Default Teeny, tiny, itsy-bitsy type

I was going to comment on three books on type or typography I got recently but all I can think to say is that despite being chock-full of information, they are almost impossible to read!

One is a revised (2004) edition of Lewis Blackwell’s 20th-Century Type. I have two earlier editions of this book, and all three are annoying to read, with wide lines of small sans-serif type. But the 1998 Remix edition was set in 8-point sans; this 2004 one is in 7 (both on about 9.5 leading). I really cannot read it for any length of time, especially as the book is large enough (8-1/2 X 11 inches X 216 pages) that it is difficult to read anywhere but at a desk or table. There is a lot of good historic information in this book, and the frequent editions keep it up to date, but anyone with eyes older than about 25 probably will not enjoy it. Great illustrations, though, and lots of them.

Next is not really a book, but issue 321 of Idea, the Japanese design magazine, all 226 pages of which are dedicated to Jan Tschichold. It is set primarily in nice large Japanese characters with English translations set in 6 or 7 serif type on 11-point leading (the captions and sidenotes are even smaller). To add insult to injury, the type is either badly drawn or the inking uneven, which makes the little letters seem to sparkle. Ouch! Poor eyes. Again, though, really great illustrations.

Finally, We Make Fonts, which comes from France. The French text is set in almost readable 8 on 9-ish sans-serif. (I can read French, but slowly.) The English, though, appears to be 5 point on 5.5 leading. This book is about type design, and its illustrations are great — especially a series that show letters “drawn” in chain-like lines with slightly open books inserted in each other, photographed from above. Then we see attempts to refine this crude bitmap into letters, and the resultant font. Nice stuff. On top of being physically hard to read, though, the text is also full of long gobbledy-gookish words — like the small print on a contract but even more impenetrable, one way or another.

Sigh. Need they all be books on typography? Do they give us any faith in that craft? Why are all the lessons learned in the first 500 years since Gutenberg being discarded? (Rhetorical questions; never mind.)

   
__________________
[SIZE=2][COLOR=LemonChiffon]::[/COLOR][/SIZE]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ktinkel is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I get into Movable Type again? BinkyM Web Site Building & Maintenance 0 06-03-2006 12:45 PM
End of Type 1 support? ktinkel Fonts & Typography 27 11-09-2005 11:43 AM
from moveable type to moving type? Sayling Fonts & Typography 1 10-04-2005 02:26 PM
Experimental type? ktinkel Fonts & Typography 0 09-21-2005 02:21 PM
Teeny bit of PHP? ktinkel Web Site Building & Maintenance 4 05-21-2005 05:34 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Contents copyright 2004–2014 Desktop Publishing Forum and its members.