Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web

Go Back   Desktop Publishing Forum > General Discussions > Print Design

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-24-2006, 07:54 AM   #1
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Default Hidden costs of Indesign

A lot of people have swopped to Indesign, stating the obvious reason that's it cheaper than Quark. I have to agree that's it's cheaper, but I work for a printers and the Indesign jobs that we have coming in need a lot more work than a Quark job to get them to rip properly.
We have trouble with the black not overprinting in Indesign even though in the preferences of the job it has been "ticked" for overprinting. There is also a problem with text near a graphic that gets bitmapped.
When a job comes in, we process it with care and hope that we pick up any odd behaviour before the job rips (using Creo Brisque, or should I now say Kodak).
Quark jobs go through without any problems. Even though we have written scripts to allow for Indesign quirks there seems to be another one waiting around the corner for us.
The upshot of all this is that we spend more time putting Indesign jobs right and the customer gets charged for this time. So is Indesign cheaper in the long run. I think not.
dogmandouglas is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quark and InDesign tables: Hidden feature? bmann Print Design 4 10-30-2006 12:30 PM
How to calculate inkjet printing costs? ElyseC Print Production & Automation 11 06-15-2006 11:39 AM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Contents copyright 2004–2019 Desktop Publishing Forum and its members.