DTP


 
Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web


Go Back   Desktop Publishing Forum > General Discussions > Print Design

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2014, 05:58 PM   #1
Hugh Wyn Griffith
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,430
Default Teen shows: Change your typeface, save millions

From CNN tonight

Teen to government: Change your typeface, save millions

[ ... ]

Quote:

"Ink is two times more expensive than French perfume by volume," Suvir says with a chuckle.

He's right: Chanel No. 5 perfume costs $38 per ounce, while the equivalent amount of Hewlett-Packard printer ink can cost up to $75.

So Suvir decided to focus his project on finding ways to cut down on the costly liquid.

Collecting random samples of teachers' handouts, Suvir concentrated on the most commonly used characters (e, t, a, o and r).

First, he charted how often each character was used in four different typefaces: Garamond, Times New Roman, Century Gothic and Comic Sans. Then he measured how much ink was used for each letter, using a commercial tool called APFill® Ink Coverage Software.

Next he enlarged the letters, printed them and cut them out on cardstock paper to weigh them to verify his findings. He did three trials for each letter, graphing the ink usage for each font.

From this analysis, Suvir figured out that by using Garamond with its thinner strokes, his school district could reduce its ink consumption by 24%, and in turn save as much as $21,000 annually.
>>

[ ... ]

   
__________________


Hugh
Hugh Wyn Griffith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 06:55 PM   #2
terrie
Staff
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,918
Default

Oh please! '-}}

If they used a laserjet instead of an inkjet, they could probably save millions of Francs/Euros not matter which font they were using...

Terrie
terrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 08:51 PM   #3
Gerry Kowarsky
Member
 
Gerry Kowarsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 519
Default

By coincidence, Thomas Phinney points out the errors in such thinking in a blog posting today: http://www.thomasphinney.com/2014/03/saving-400m-font/
Gerry Kowarsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 01:15 PM   #4
terrie
Staff
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,918
Default

Quote:
gerry: Thomas Phinney points out the errors in such thinking in a blog posting today:
Must be a really popular post because I get an error message that the bandwidth has been exceeded...I'll try it again later...

Terrie
terrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 09:55 AM   #5
Paul
Member
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York State
Posts: 267
Default

A reply I tried to post yesterday disappeared into the ether, I guess, but my thoughts were about the same as Thomas's, without the math. Garamond (any flavor) and some similar types look smaller and lighter than other types at the same point size because they are smaller and lighter. Accordingly, many readers perceive them as hard to read, and to achieve equal readability they have to be set larger.

It happens that synagogues I've attended have used two prayer books set in Garamond: Stempel in the 1970s and Adobe in this century. People who attend services are, on average, somewhat older than the population in general, and the type in these is deservedly unpopular no matter how beautiful it is. (A rival denomination uses Melior, which is just plain irritating.) My experience is that the bifocal brigade (of which I am a member) wants type to be as big and as black as possible.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 11:41 AM   #6
Andrew B.
Staff
 
Andrew B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,500
Default

I can't help but think of that curious odor that duplicated handouts had when I went to high school, and how a few of us could not help but take a whiff of the paper. So now, I can't help but imagine the reaction students would have to hand-outs printed with Chanel No. 5.

   
__________________
fallberry.com
Andrew B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 03:36 PM   #7
Bo Aakerstrom
Member
 
Bo Aakerstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Derby,UK
Posts: 1,316
Default

If something is printed with Chanel No.5, instead of reading aloud you would have to be smelling aloud. I'd expect a comma and full stop to be kind of hard to tell, sorry, smell apart. I think ink is a better option after all.

   
__________________
www.boaakerstrom.com
Behance Portfolio
Bo Aakerstrom is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 01:20 AM   #8
annc
Sysop
 
annc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Subtropical Queensland, Australia, between the mountains and the Coral Sea
Posts: 4,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew B. View Post
I can't help but think of that curious odor that duplicated handouts had when I went to high school, and how a few of us could not help but take a whiff of the paper. So now, I can't help but imagine the reaction students would have to hand-outs printed with Chanel No. 5.
Were they the spirit duplicators (metho) or the gestetner machines (ink)?

The correction fluid for the gestetner pages had alcohol in it too, from memory, so it had its own smell.

How sensory deprived young people are these days...

   
__________________
annc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 08:27 AM   #9
Paul
Member
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York State
Posts: 267
Default

We had both, but the powerful aroma came from the mimeograph ink (Gestetner was a brand name). Children perceive the odors of VOCs more powerfully than do adults, I think.

My last encounter with mimeo ink was in 1998-99 when I worked at a school that had a Risograph: a machine that made a mimeo stencil by scanning the original. It was automated enough to install the stencil on its own and remove it when the next page was scanned, so no one had to handle the inky stencils unless it jammed. It also ran very fast once it had installed the stencil; sometimes it shot the output pages clear across the room.


Quote:
Originally Posted by annc View Post
Were they the spirit duplicators (metho) or the gestetner machines (ink)?

The correction fluid for the gestetner pages had alcohol in it too, from memory, so it had its own smell.

How sensory deprived young people are these days...
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 05:07 PM   #10
Andrew B.
Staff
 
Andrew B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,500
Default

Here's an article about it: http://www.retroland.com/ditto-paper/

I was just making a joke about getting high. The reason for sniffing them is it was just such a surprisingly unusual odor.

   
__________________
fallberry.com
Andrew B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Duh! (Save web page to PDF) Andrew B. The Corner Pub 22 03-03-2014 07:16 AM
Settings for live shows? livewire Photography 19 10-05-2008 10:11 AM
Can kangaroos save the world? Mike The Corner Pub 22 01-08-2008 04:10 PM
IE Save As vs. Cut & Paste DOCTYPES dthomsen8 Web Site Building & Maintenance 2 01-29-2006 09:13 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Contents copyright 2004–2014 Desktop Publishing Forum and its members.