DTP


 
Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web


Go Back   Desktop Publishing Forum > General Discussions > Web Design

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2006, 05:10 AM   #1
kyleiq
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
Default SAT PracticeTest

I created a new SAT Test Prep website, www.satprepplan.com, and would like to get feedback on the site from an ESL perspective. The site is fully functional; the most interesting bit about it is the custom study plan creation tool. Students take the SAT practice test and then a custom prep plan is created for them based on their strengths, weaknesses, times to study, and time until the test. SAT Prep Plan also includes a bunch of practice problems, problem solving videos, SAT vocabulary, tips and other prep materials.
kyleiq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 05:50 AM   #2
dthomsen8
Member
 
dthomsen8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA 19130
Posts: 2,158
Default Post a new thread

You should post this request in a new thread, probably in Web Site Design. Over here, it is buried in type discussions.

That said, your HTML is filled with double quote marks, especially in alt="" parameters, and that should be fixed.
dthomsen8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 06:00 AM   #3
ktinkel
Founding Sysop
 
ktinkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Connecticut, on the Housatonic River near its mouth at Long Island Sound.
Posts: 11,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dthomsen8 View Post
You should post this request in a new thread, probably in Web Site Design. Over here, it is buried in type discussions.
Right you are, David. Done.

   
__________________
[SIZE=2][COLOR=LemonChiffon]::[/COLOR][/SIZE]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ktinkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 10:12 AM   #4
bmann
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 192
Default

I don't do website design but as a user I would like to see the whole site centered on my screen instead of left aligned (I'm running 1280x1024) and some kind of graphic or banner on the top of the first page (similar to Apple.com but maybe smaller, like 1/3 or 1/2 that size) to tell me hey this is the first page.
bmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 10:59 AM   #5
Kelvyn
Staff
 
Kelvyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In the Heart of the English Lake District
Posts: 1,381
Default

English is not my second language but XHTML is..

The left aligned and narrow table used to hold the content put me right off. Did you really mean to use a 600px narrow table for the content? Monitor resolution has moved on a lot over the last few years. I'd also look at the code used - HTML4.01 was really superceded in 2000, six years ago. There are more than a few errors, see this W3C test result. I would suggest you specify a body background colour in your CSS as the pages looked a bit silly against my browser default pink background. Don't rely on people having a browser default of white.

I had difficulty reading the text, mainly because it seems that every sentence is interrupted with bold text. I did try the test - well a couple of questions, but found it hard to see what was required to complete them. Perhaps that's because Queen's English is my prime language.

Interesting concept.

   
__________________
Kelvyn

Web site design, hosting and marketing, Keswick in the UK Lake District

If you are planning a visit to Keswick then try Keswick Tourist Information website

Kelvyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 04:48 AM   #6
donmcc
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sarnia, Canada
Posts: 1,122
Default

A few things. The underrules are very annoying. Not your fault, we have to blame Tim Berners-Lee for that. But you could use a different color for links, and have the underlines appear only when the mouse is hovering over them.

Also, was the page built on a Mac? There are many unrecognized characters appearing as rectangles on my machine. For instance
Students begin testing on Oct. 9
starts with one. If this is a bullet, quote mark, or any other non-ASCII chartacter, it should be input as an entity so that it will work cross platform.
donmcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 06:40 AM   #7
iamback
Member
 
iamback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 4,894
Default

In addition to Kelvyn's notes, which I agree with, I found the working of the test set quite confusing.

For instance, example text and questions about text are distinguished only by a subtle difference in font - a clearer outline of content (for instance with an outline or background color) would help with reading.

Overall, the use of radio buttons is particularly awkward, because it deviates totally from the standard by putting the prompt before the radio button instead of after it; the alternating background colors actually make it even harder here because the description of one radio button is actually closer to the background of the preceding one. I am sure that in at least one case this made me hit another button than the one intended one, however hard I tried to 'retrain" myself to look before the radio button for the answer instead of after it.

Then there is content - there are some confusions here, too. For starters, it's even hard to refer to a particular section, since several sections seem to have the same name. So... in the "first" maths section, no. 2/5, the graph is a point graph, but the labels along the bottom don't match up with lines but with the space between lines: there is no way to decide how to interpret the graph: which vertical line corresponds to which quarter?? There is actually one more vertical line with data points than there are labels!

The "second" writing section (essay) I found particularly weird. If the idea of an essay is to forms one's own opinion and defend this in the form of an essay, how can any answer (in the sample) be "correct"? The question asked is "is democracy the best form of government?" - but all possible answers seem to assume that it is the best form of government and clearly don't provide any space for a differing opinion. (Besides which, "democracy" is not a form of goverment by itself...)

But most of all, the whole layout (apart from the already mentioned wrong layout of the radio buttons) hinders rather than helps interpretation and usage of the site. For instance the colored bands at the top of rounded boxes do not support anything; the alternating colors on the radio buttons make it harder, not easier to use them, especially combined with the wrong layout. Instead, color could have been used to more clearly separate subject matter from questions about it (or another mechanism - but as it is, the distinction is not clear enough).

Another point (but maybe this the same in an actual SAT test?) is that it's rather roundabout to first list a number of questions, label them with letters, and then have radio buttons with the letter labels (before them) - why not make the list of possible answers directly into radio buttons? If you do this, the actual radio buttons would also "naturally" come before the prompt instead of after it just by replacing the letter label with the radio button itself.

   
__________________
Marjolein Katsma
Look through my eyes on Cultural Surfaces (soon!), My ArtFlakes shop and Flickr.
Occasionally I am also connecting online dots... and sometimes you can follow me on Marjolein's Travel Blog
iamback is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test my site donmcc Web Site Building & Maintenance 25 10-01-2005 07:44 AM
Browser test site: Acid2 from WaSP ktinkel Web Site Building & Maintenance 0 04-25-2005 01:30 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Contents copyright 2004–2014 Desktop Publishing Forum and its members.