DTP


 
Lively discussions on the graphic arts and publishing — in print or on the web


Go Back   Desktop Publishing Forum > General Discussions > Fonts & Typography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2006, 10:09 AM   #1
Michael Rowley
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ipswich (the one in England)
Posts: 5,105
Default Embedding test (2)

Perhaps it will work this time.

No good: file is too big to upload. I can't make it as small as the limit (which you're told after you've tried.

   
__________________
Michael
Michael Rowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 10:32 AM   #2
annc
Sysop
 
annc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Subtropical Queensland, Australia, between the mountains and the Coral Sea
Posts: 4,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Rowley
Perhaps it will work this time.

No good: file is too big to upload. I can't make it as small as the limit (which you're told after you've tried.
What sort of a file is it, and what size? We can change the limits in the software.

   
__________________
annc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 11:15 AM   #3
Michael Rowley
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ipswich (the one in England)
Posts: 5,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by annc
What sort of a file is it, and what size? We can change the limits in the software.
Ann:

The Word file, testfont.doc, that I tried to upload was way too big: 683 kbyte. It's necessarily large, because it contains the embedded fonts, but even before the fonts were embedded the size was about 37 kbyte: Word isn't noted for small files! Zipping hardly helps, as fonts don't compress well.

It's a pity, because although I'm convinced the file has embedded fonts recognized by Word (I could open it myself, after carefully deactivating minionpr.ttf, and all the ligatures were visible), previous exchanges of documents gave negative results, i.e. the man that received the document thought to contain Minion Pro reported lots of 'boxes'. I should have liked to get the verdict of more font-savvy people.

   
__________________
Michael
Michael Rowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 12:45 PM   #4
Steve Rindsberg
Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

I'm hardly a Word wiz, but if you want to email it to me, I'll have a look.

steve at-in-a-circle steve rindsberg dot com concatenate and punctuate and you'll find me.

   
__________________
Steve Rindsberg
====================
www.pptfaq.com
www.pptools.com
and stuff
Steve Rindsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 01:32 PM   #5
Michael Rowley
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ipswich (the one in England)
Posts: 5,105
Default

Steve:

'if you want to email it to me, I'll have a look'

Thank you: I've already sent the file along the wires to you, and it'll be with you any day now. It doesn't need a Word-whizz, just someone that can tell letters from quadrangles.

   
__________________
Michael
Michael Rowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 03:29 PM   #6
Steve Rindsberg
Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Rowley
Steve:

'if you want to email it to me, I'll have a look'

Thank you: I've already sent the file along the wires to you, and it'll be with you any day now. It doesn't need a Word-whizz, just someone that can tell letters from quadrangles.
I've attached a screenshot of what I see in Word 2003.

On another machine, I selected all the text and changed it to Arial Unicode, which fixed the problems with the words in the top row. The rest of the words/characters were still ... er ... quadrangulated.

On both computers, the file opens read-only.

Now let's send this and see if the attachment worked.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Word2003.png
Views:	126
Size:	40.0 KB
ID:	402  

   
__________________
Steve Rindsberg
====================
www.pptfaq.com
www.pptools.com
and stuff
Steve Rindsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 05:29 AM   #7
Michael Rowley
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ipswich (the one in England)
Posts: 5,105
Default

Steve:

Thanks a lot: now everyone can see the intended result of opening the test file.

As far as I know, Arial Unicode has no ligatures apart from the usual pair, fl & fi (which Georgia has too); unless you took extraordinary pains, attempts to change the font work with every letter except the ligatures, which remain Minion Pro. It appears that in Word 2003 the font is exceptionally sticky. The only way I could get all the letters Georgia in the second table was to go to a completely different style first, then back to the intended style.

   
__________________
Michael
Michael Rowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 12:54 PM   #8
Michael Rowley
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ipswich (the one in England)
Posts: 5,105
Default

Steve:

'Arial Unicode has no ligatures apart from the usual pair'

Correction: Arial Unicode has all of them provided in Unicode, but my test text used a few ligatures that are in the PUA in a few Adobe OT fonts; all the s.c. and o.s. numerals are also from the PUA.

   
__________________
Michael
Michael Rowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 03:46 PM   #9
Steve Rindsberg
Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

One little trick that comes in handy is to save as HTML then edit the font references within the HTML and finally open the HTML back into Word.

That doesn't change what I see here however. I don't thing those ligatures are present in Arial Unicode. But that's not the issue, is it? The main point is that it does seem to work correctly wit the embedded font (though the text itself looks ragged compared with the same text in Georgia)

   
__________________
Steve Rindsberg
====================
www.pptfaq.com
www.pptools.com
and stuff
Steve Rindsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 03:47 PM   #10
Steve Rindsberg
Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Rowley
Steve:

'Arial Unicode has no ligatures apart from the usual pair'

Correction: Arial Unicode has all of them provided in Unicode, but my test text used a few ligatures that are in the PUA in a few Adobe OT fonts; all the s.c. and o.s. numerals are also from the PUA.
That makes sense ... I went looking for the missing glyphs in Character Map but didn't find them.

   
__________________
Steve Rindsberg
====================
www.pptfaq.com
www.pptools.com
and stuff
Steve Rindsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Embedding problem in MS Word Michael Rowley Fonts & Typography 23 10-27-2006 09:37 PM
Font embedding permissions Michael Rowley Fonts & Typography 0 08-27-2006 03:14 PM
Embedding test Michael Rowley Fonts & Typography 4 02-21-2006 10:02 AM
MS Word's embedding restrictions Michael Rowley Fonts & Typography 8 02-20-2006 03:13 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Contents copyright 2004–2014 Desktop Publishing Forum and its members.